Let’s celebrate the end of the rotten PCR test for ‘Covid’. It underpinned the fear narrative for over a year. Now it’s gone and the masks are coming off those who profited from it.
First the news:
After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only.
In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season. Laboratories and testing sites should validate and verify their selected assay within their facility before beginning clinical testing.
In fact, it was announced a while ago, but I am writing this post on the last day of the PCR test’s official existence. Presumably the CDC has known for a long time that it was ‘flawed’.
Careful reading of this text reveals that this is bureaucratic speak for ‘The PCR test can’t distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 (i.e. Covid-19) and influenza so we had to get rid of it’. Presumably by the way this also means that the PCR test cannot distinguish between Covid-19 and the other members of the closely related coronavirus family of ‘colds’ either. This explains why supposedly there was no flu last winter. Is there any explanation for flu’s supposed disappearance other than everything’s being rolled up in the Covid numbers?
It’s just that when they tested everyone who died in hospitals, even from road accidents, and allocated as many as possible to ‘Covid’ on the basis of the PCR test, they accidentally included (mainly?) people who had traces of flu bugs or other pathogens. It was all grist to the fear mill.
This comes after earlier CDC admissions that genetic material recovered from running the test at more than around 25 iterations is so fragmentary that you could not culture it up into a viable organism even in the comfy (from a bug’s point of view) conditions of a laboratory, let alone the incredibly hostile conditions (again for bugs) inside a healthy human being. So running the PCR test at 40 plus iterations, as governments did, was known to be bogus.
And then there’s the problem that whatever the PCR test actually ‘found’ could be weeks old or worse, and could indeed have been breathed in from the atmosphere. The throat lining is after all an exterior surface of the body. The viral fragment may never have got into the body of the ‘case’ in question in the first place. This could well also be the true of the annoying and probably equally useless self-administered ‘Lateral Flow’ tests.
The fact that the PCR test is being withdrawn says it all.
IMAGINE IF THERE HAD BEEN NO PCR TESTS
Just think what the last year and a half would have been like without the PCR test.
To varying degrees, in the great scheme of things 2020 was a nothing-burger around the world in terms of overall mortality. In the UK, every year before 2005 or so had higher age-adjusted mortality than the supposedly calamitous plague year of 2020. There was a roughly 12% increase in overall mortality (compared to the unusually low average of the preceding 5 years). That excess is equivalent to 0.1% of the population. This mainly occurred in the spring of 2020. Last winter there was a diminutive Covid-19 second wave alongside what were obviously more numerous flu and other winter cold cases which were being misclassified by the PCR test.
Without the PCR test there would be no perfectly healthy people being diagnosed as ‘cases’ – which credulous people thought, and were meant to think – were actually people being quite ill. There would be no support for the notion that asymptomatic people can spread the infection. Such cases are incredibly rare (as explained by Dr Peter McCullough in the interview attached to a recent post), if not non-existent, and therefore in public health terms irrelevant.
Without the false narrative that asymptomatic spreading and ‘cases’ were significant the whole fear narrative would have collapsed in the summer of 2020 – when the PCR test was conveniently introduced at just the right moment. Without the fear, there could be no ramp-up in ‘cases’ every time people were panicked into being tested and getting masses of PCR false positives.
No need therefore for healthy people to mask up, avoid the office or in any other way not to live and act completely normally. No need for lockdowns, travel restrictions, social distancing or anything else. No additional bankruptcies, suicide and overdose deaths, no old people dying alone in nursing homes, no ruined friendships and relationships, and no crippled businesses - no 10% fall in GDP even. And no 100,000 jab deaths in the West (probably, based on Peter McCullough’s conservative estimate, see previous post). It would be just like, I don’t know, 1968, when the Hong Kong flu caused a very bad cold season and life went on completely as normal.
Those who believe they lost a loved one to Covid-19 actually have no way of knowing if Covid-19 had anything to do with it. And that’s before one recognizes that many or even most such (Covid or flu?) deaths were preventable using protocols based on existing medicines. Western Public Health officials however chose to let people die untreated.
To put it bluntly, nearly everything people think they know about the ‘pandemic’, or at least have been told by the mainstream media and political ‘leaders’, was based on the useless PCR test. We really have a lot to thank the PCR test for. Good riddance to it.
AFTER THE PCR TEST
In the post-PCR-test world, what have we got? Basically, an incredibly mild bug in the form of the so-called Omicron variant which manifests as sniffles, largely amongst the vaccinated. For example, in Germany 95% of cases are in vaccinated people, and Germany is much less than 95% vaccinated. Therefore being vaccinated may make illness more likely, not less.
Has anybody noticed how the RNA gene modification ‘vaccines’ stopped people from getting ‘Covid’ or transmitting it like the politicians said they would? Me neither. More footballers and athletes have probably collapsed and died from the jabs, or been crippled by them, than people have died from Omicron. Not that this stops fear-mongers from using Omicron to scare the remaining wits out of the credulous.
By the way, the media has attempted to convince us that the never-jabbed in the UK are a small fraction of the population. But this meme has been helpfully exposed by UK government figures, no less, as being incorrect. There are 15 million people, or 27% of the population of England, who are eligible for the untested RNA therapies but have decided not to participate in this undeniably reckless genetic experiment. If you include ineligible people, presumably mostly children, 42% of the English population has yet to be jabbed. Meanwhile, with each additional jab and booster, the uselessness (but not safety) of the preceding RNA jabs becomes clear to more and more potential refuseniks.
It’s a real problem for media fear-mongers, vaccine peddlers, vandals and power grabbing fascists of all hues all over the Western world. Unfortunately, they are unlikely to go quietly into that dark night to which they would so happily consign others. Jordan Peterson once defined evil as willingness to inflict avoidable suffering. Just saying, is all.
Isn’t it fabulous that we live in state dominated societies where officials and their sociopathic chums in the global bureaucracies, media companies, Healthcare, Big Tech and Big Pharma, can use their state privileged positions to keep on moving the goal posts, lining their pockets and generally making life harder for everyone else?
Links to other articles:
Martin Armstrong, amongst many others, has reported on the end of the PCR test:
Just to confirm my tin-hat credentials, here is a link to an Eric Peters post. It includes a video of athletes and others collapsing, apparently as a result of receiving the RNA gene therapy jab. It is possible of course that I have been misled. Maybe such people collapse all the time, so a pinch of salt may be called for.
Also, like Eric Peters, I would distance myself from the first several seconds of the video. I do not believe that the jabs are going to cause large scale mortality in the West, let alone the rest of the world (where they have largely, and sensibly, been dismissed).
Though in the absence of proper long-term trials there is no certainty. Food for thought anyway?